The Winner Does Not Take All: Lessons from the Israel-Hamas Conflict

  • Gadi Hitman

    Dr. Hitman is a lecturer in the Political Science and Middle East Department, Ariel University and a postdoctoral fellow at Hebrew University, Truman Institution, Israel.

  • Alona Itskovich

     Ms. Itskovich is a master's student in the Department of Middle Eastern Studies and Political Science at Ariel University.

 

Despite countless studies on victory in armed conflict, scholars disagree about the exact meaning of this term. This article, using primary sources in Hebrew and Arabic, aims to define victory and to discern between types of successful outcomes in war. We analyze three case studies of military collision between Israel and Hamas through a model featuring four levels: tactical, operational, strategic, and systemic. The study shows that in all three clashes (2008, 2012, 2014), the outcomes are difficult to evaluate because the boundaries between the definitions are foggy. It also concludes that neither side has achieved a strategic victory that breaks the status quo that has held since June 2007—though Hamas’s leaders have claimed strategic victory due to the group’s survival. Israel, without advanced planning, has relied on tactical wins for its strategic policy.

  • Gadi Hitman

    Dr. Hitman is a lecturer in the Political Science and Middle East Department, Ariel University and a postdoctoral fellow at Hebrew University, Truman Institution, Israel.

  • Alona Itskovich

     Ms. Itskovich is a master's student in the Department of Middle Eastern Studies and Political Science at Ariel University.

Scroll to Top