We appreciate any support towards the Middle East Policy Council to help educate Americans on the political, economic and cultural issues that affect U.S. interests in the Middle East.
Interested in the latest updates with MEPC? Join our newsletter to learn more.
One of the most frequently cited journals on the Middle East in the field of international affairs, Middle East Policy has been engaging thoughtful minds for more than 40 years with high-quality, diverse analysis on the region.
Khalaf Ahmad Al Habtoor
Guest Commentary
I am currently travelling around the United States after spending a very enlightening few days in Washington, DC, where I was privileged to address delegates attending the 25th Annual Arab-U.S. Policymakers Conference for the second year running.
This year, the event was titled “The Next U.S. Presidency and U.S.-Arab Relations, Probabilities, Possibilities, Potential Pitfalls.” Needless to say, the American capital is abuzz with speculation as to who will take the prize on November 8th.
I appreciate the opportunity to feel the pulse of the electorate up close and personal, and also to exchange views with high profile individuals with close links to the Obama administration and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Like almost everyone I spoke with, I believed that the contest was virtually over in light of the scandalous accusations surrounding her rival. However, subsequent to the FBI’s reopening of its investigation into Clinton’s private server, the race is turning out to be a nail-biter.
Nationwide polls now give Hilary a two percent lead, but as Britons who voted whether to stay or quit the EU can attest, polls are often unreliable indicators. Moreover, the deciding factor has little to do with poll ratings. Indicating preferences to pollsters is one thing, which candidate’s supporters will be more inclined to vote with their feet quite another.
I have no intention of attempting to influence the will of the American people so close to the big day, and, in any case, I have made my personal preference clear in previous columns. I can only trust that our American friends choose wisely, because not only are they voting for a president, they are also responsible for selecting the most influential person on the planet, with the power to make war and peace.
Who the next incumbent of the Oval office will be and what he or she will do is not only of concern to Americans, but has the potential of impacting us all in different ways.
As you know, my part of the world is undergoing one of the most tumultuous eras in living history. Unfortunately, President Barack Obama failed to live up to his early promise — to the extent that a senior member of the Nobel committee regrets their decision to award him the coveted Nobel Peace Prize.
I do not wish to rehash his laundry list of bad judgments, which have contributed to making the region more dangerous than ever; they are well known. Yet it is incontestable that, on his watch, parts of the Middle East have descended into chaos and bloodshed. Worse, he has abandoned America’s tried and true allies in favor of its number one enemy, recognised as the world’s biggest state sponsor of terrorism.
Mr Obama will soon be packing his bags. It is time to look to the future and in that regard I would urge his successor to make every effort to fix what successive administrations have either wilfully or unintentionally broken. To that end, here are a few of my own pointers, which are by no means a definitive indicator of the mammoth job at hand:
I realise the above constitutes a tall order. But provided Mr. or Madam President shows the right will and takes advice from genuine Middle East experts rather than amateurs or yes-men, putting the region on a better footing can be achieved over time. Re-establishing trust, eroded during the Obama years, is a crucial first step.